Gastrointestinal Intervention

Hurdles and highlights in the development of a novel robotic platform for endoscopic surgery

Jennie Y.Y. Wong, Khek-Yu Ho

Additional article information

Abstract

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is viewed by many as one of the most disruptive shifts in surgical practices in recent years. NOTES changes the approach to surgery in such a fundamental way that it poses an enormous challenge to current endoscopic technologies that were not designed to support NOTES. Implementation of NOTES necessitates transformative innovations with capabilities far beyond what incremental technology changes can provide. To address this unmet demand, innovators around the world have been working on new designs for instruments, each with its unique features and ability to mitigate specific technical challenges encountered in performance of NOTES. However, to date, most new inventions are still modeled on conventional endoscopy platforms. The MASTER-SPACE stands out as being the only approach that uses robotics to radically change the way endoscopic interventions are conducted. With robotics enhancement, MASTER-SPACE addresses some of the most critical technical issues hindering further development of NOTES. Here we describe the basis for the innovation of MASTER-SPACE, progress since design conception, and provide some insights on its further development, the success of which, we think, could be key to accelerating the advancement of NOTES.

Keywords: Endoscopic technology, Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, Robotics-enhanced endoscopic surgery

Introduction

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents a paradigm shift in surgical approach whereby surgical targets in the peritoneal cavity are accessed via natural body orifices and surgical procedures are conducted entirely through the endoscope. The approach eliminates the need to make external incisions on the body and thus promises no somatic pain and better cosmetic results. However, NOTES is technically more complex and more difficult to perform than laparoscopic surgery. This is primarily because surgical tools must be navigated through tortuous access routes and surgical instruments must be manipulated within a very limited operational field. Besides, the current lack of purpose-designed surgical tools is impeding adoption of this novel surgical approach. New, more dexterous endosurgical platforms, better endosurgical tools, and auxiliary devices designed to specifically support NOTES are just beginning to emerge, with most still under initial evaluation for efficacy and safety in NOTES applications. Among the emerging systems, notable ones include: (1) the Master and Slave Translumenal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER) developed by the National University of Singapore and Nanyang Technological University (Singapore)13; (2) the Anubis-scope developed by Karl Storz (Germany)4; (3) the Incisionless Operating Platform developed by USGI Medical (USA)5; (4) the EndoSAMURAI developed by Olympus (Japan)6; (5) the Direct Drive Endoscopic System developed by Boston Scientific (USA)7; (6) the i-snake in vivo robotic system developed under sponsorship by the Wellcome Trust (UK)8; and (7) the R scope developed by Olympus (Japan).9 In the following sections, we review the development of MASTER, which stands out from the rest because it is a standalone robotics-enhanced and haptics-enabled platform. We also provide insights into its further development.

Why the need for robotic technology?

The inherent lack of dexterity in current endoscopy systems remains the biggest challenge to adoption of NOTES; issues that need to be overcome include inefficient transmission of force through the flexible endoscope, inability to perform off-axis manipulation of surgical targets, and inadequate visualization of the surgical field. There are many ways to address technical deficiencies, including complete system innovations and stepwise technical modifications. To date, technical advances in endoscopy have been incremental, and medical device companies have largely focused on commoditization of tailored endoscopic accessories to sustain market share rather than making breakthrough innovations in endoscopic systems. While incremental changes enhance the functions of an existing system and often make applications easier, lead to more productive use, and even yield better clinical outcomes, such small advances do not lead to transformational changes in endoscopic practices. For NOTES implementation in clinical practice, the new endosurgical system must support multi-axis performance of tasks such that instrumental motions are independent of the endoscope’s motion. It should provide maximum instrumental dexterity for stable yet unrestricted articulation of effectors to facilitate precise surgical maneuvers, especially crucial actions such as tissue grasping, retraction, traction, and counter-traction, and effective triangulation of surgical instruments. Moreover, the system should allow effective transmission of force from the operator’s hands down the shaft of the endoscope to the surgical target, as well as provide good visualization of the surgical field. All these goals can only be realized through incorporation of robotic technology in the endosurgical platform.

Development of a robotics-enhanced endosurgical system

In 2004, inspired by the adeptness of crab chelipeds, a team of innovators in Singapore began to design a new robotics-enhanced endosurgical system for performance of intricate endoscopic procedures.10 Some 7 years later, the resulting invention, aptly named Masterand Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER), was used in a first-in-man multicenter clinical trial. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancer was successfully performed on five patients at the Asia Institute of Gastroenterology (Hyderabad, India) and the Prince of Wales Hospital (Hong Kong, China).11 Details of this human trial and results of earlier animal survival studies have been reported in several peer-reviewed journals.1114 Early MASTER development and specifications for the initial prototypes have been described.13 In brief, MASTER is a robotics-enhanced endosurgical system designed with an intelligent central controller (master) and a human–machine interface whereby the operator can remotely control the actions of the end surgical effectors (slaves) (Fig. 1). Robotic technology maximizes the degrees of freedom for articulation of any instruments deployed. It facilitates free spatial orientation and off-axis bimanual coordination of surgical instruments to allow easy retraction, approximation, and dissection of the target tissue. MASTER is intuitively operated, highly dexterous, and comes with haptic feedback capability that provides users with ease of use and a sense of touch when manipulating tissues.

Figure F1
MASTER with dexterous slave manipulators deployed at the distal end of the endoscope.

Filling the remaining technology gaps

While MASTER has effectively mitigated most of the major technical challenges faced by endoscopists using conventional techniques, the endosurgical platform is incomplete without suitable auxiliary devices. The need for deliberate viscerotomy in NOTES is not in line with conventional tenets of safe surgery because safe closure of the visceral perforation remains difficult with currently available endoscopic tools. Simple endoscopic clips, T-tags, T-bars, T-fasteners, Padlock-G clips, the over-the-scope clip system, and septal occluders have been tested for this application, but have limitations.1520 Although suturing devices such as endoscopic staplers (Ethicon Endo-Surgery), the g-Cath/g-Proxtissue approximation device (USGI Medical, USA), the flexible Endostich (Covidien, USA), the OverStitch (Apollo Endosurgery, USA), the Plicator (NDO Surgical, USA), and the Eagle Claw VII (Apollo Endosurgery) may yield a better result, the efficacy and safety of these devices in NOTES has yet to be fully established.2025 Besides difficult viscerotomy closure, creation of a pneumoperitoneum for adequate exposure and visualization of the surgical field during NOTES is an issue. Currently, endoscopic performance of intralumenal procedures relies on on-demand manual insufflation by an endoscopist. Air or CO2 is supplied through the endoscope with no pressure monitoring. This practice can produce wide fluctuations in endolumenal pressure, but is justified because the gastrointestinal tract allows migration of excessive gas into the upstream/downstream bowel. However, in NOTES, this can cause fluctuations in intraperitoneal pressure, and excessive insufflation can result in serious abdominal compartment syndrome and adverse hemodynamic effects, so conventional on-demand insufflation is unsuitable.26

The MASTER-SPACE solution

To overcome the above issue, the MASTER development team is now working with a Japanese industry–academia consortium, Endeavor for Next-Generation Interventional Endoscopy (ENGINE), to incorporate a novel, flexible, automatic, CO2 insufflation platform called SPACE (Steady Pressure Automatically Controlled Endoscopy). SPACE comprises a commercially available standard endoscopic overtube and a newly developed detachable leak-proof device with an anti-reflux valve and a Luer lock connection. SPACE is designed to provide highly reproducible and automatically re-distending endoscopic exposure in the gastrointestinal tract during endoscopic surgery.26,27 Use of SPACE removes the need for concurrent control of manual insufflation during endoscopic procedures so that the endoscopic surgeon can focus attention on performing the surgery. When ready, the combined MASTER-SPACE technology is expected to support a range of endoscopic surgical interventions, including NOTES.

Catering to new developments in NOTES

According to a recent review by Chiu et al,28 recent developments in NOTES in Asia have mostly focused on extension of the concept of NOTES. These experimental NOTES-related procedures include: (1) endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR); (2) per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM); and (3) submucosal endoscopic tumorectomy (SET). However, it was noted that most pilot human EFTR trials were carried out with laparoscopic assistance because of the lack of dedicated tools with sufficient dexterity to support the complex procedures. In POEM and SET, submucosal tunneling is used to perform myotomy and resect gastrointestinal submucosal tumors, respectively. It is believed that submucosal tunneling yields safer access to the peritoneal cavity and closure of the gastrointestinal defect. However, with current endoscopic platforms, complications associated with such procedures may remain a problem, as reported by Ren et al.29 We expect that the use of MASTER-SPACE could mitigate some of the technical constraints. There is plan to develop a series of MASTER-adaptable dedicated tools to support tasks such as creation of a submucosal access route, endoscopic tunneling, and effective closure of the resultant defect in the gastrointestinal wall.

Next: a complete toolbox for NOTES

Experience from trials using earlier MASTER prototypes has provided new insights into further development of the system to better support the performance of NOTES. Apart from incorporating an automatic CO2 insufflation system as described above, the MASTER development team is working on adaptation of some of the most desirable auxiliary devices for the most popular endolumenal and transluminal procedures, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal cancer, full-thickness gastric resection, and total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer, among others.

Conclusion

The robotics-enhanced MASTER is one of the most promising endosurgical systems currently being developed for NOTES. Further development of MASTER-SPACE, together with a full range of easily deployable surgical end-effectors, is ongoing. When the completed system is ready, we expect that it will make performance of NOTES and related procedures easier and safer. The success of this innovative endosurgical system could be key to accelerating the advancement of NOTES towards better patient care.

Article information

Gastrointestinal Intervention.Dec 30, 2013; 2(2): 87-89.
Published online 2013-12-31. doi:  10.1016/j.gii.2013.09.007
1Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
*Corresponding author. Department of Medicine, National University Health System, NUHS Tower Block, Level 10, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228., E-mail address:khek_yu_ho@nuhs.edu.sg (K.-Y. Ho).
Received July 25, 2013; Accepted September 12, 2013.
Articles from Gastrointestinal Intervention are provided here courtesy of Gastrointestinal Intervention

References

  • Phee SJ, Low SC, Huynh VA, Kencana AP, Sun ZL, Yang K. Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1192-5.
  • Phee SJ, Low SC, Sun ZL, Ho KY, Huang WM, Thant ZM. Robotic system for no-scar gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2008;4:15-22.
  • Phee SJ, Kencana AP, Huynh AV, Sun ZL, Low SC, Yang K. Design of a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt C J Mech Eng Sci. 2010;224:1495-503.
  • Diana M, Chung H, Liu KH, Dallemagne B, Demartines N, Mutter D. Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4130-5.
  • Horgan S, Thompson K, Talamini M, Ferreres A, Jacobsen G, Spaun G. Clinical experience with a multifunctional, flexible surgery system for endolumenal, single-port, and NOTES procedures. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:586-92.
  • Spaun GO, Zheng B, Swanström LL. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2720-7.
  • Thompson CC, Ryou M, Soper NJ, Hungess ES, Rothstein RI, Swanstrom LL. Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endoluminal and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery applications (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:121-5.
  • Shang J, Noonan DP, Payne C, Clark J, Sodergren MH, Darzi A 2011. An articulated universal joint based flexible access robot for minimally invasive surgery., Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp.1147-52.
  • Lee SH, Gromski MA, Derevianko A, Jones DB, Pleskow DK, Sawhney M. Efficacy of a prototype endoscope with two deflecting working channels for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective, comparative, ex vivo study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:155-60.
  • Wang Z, Phee SJ, Wong J, Ho KY. Development of a robotic platform for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Interv. 2012;1:40-2.
  • Phee SJ, Reddy N, Chiu PW, Rebala P, Rao GV, Wang Z. Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection is effective in treating patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1117-21.
  • Wang Z, Phee SJ, Lomanto D, Goel R, Rebala P, Sun ZL. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot: an animal survival study. Endoscopy. 2012;44:690-4.
  • Ho KY, Phee SJ, Shabbir A, Low SC, Huynh VA, Kencana AP. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:593-9.
  • Phee SJ, Ho KY, Lomanto D, Low SC, Huynh VA, Kencana AP. Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER). Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2293-8.
  • von Renteln D, Vassiliou MC, Rothstein RI. Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomies. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1056-61.
  • Singhal S, Changela K, Papafragkakis H, Anand S, Krishnaiah M, Duddempudi S. Over the Scope Clip: technique and expanding clinical applications. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:749-56.
  • Bhat YM, Hegde S, Knaus M, Solomon J, Kochman ML. Transluminal endosurgery: novel use of endoscopic tacks for the closure of access sites in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1161-6.
  • Perretta S, Sereno S, Forgione A, Dallemagne B, Coumaros D, Boosfeld C. A new method to close the gastrotomy by using a cardiac septal occluder: long-term survival study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:809-13.
  • Daram SR, Tang SJ, Wu R, To SD. Benchtop testing and comparisons among three types of through-the-scope endoscopic clipping devices. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1521-9.
  • Sun G, Yang Y, Zhang X, Li W, Wang Y, Zhang L. Comparison of gastrotomy closure modalities for natural orifice transluminal surgery: a canine study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:774-83.
  • Moran EA, Gostout CJ, Bingener J. Preliminary performance of a flexible cap and catheter-based endoscopic suturing system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1375-83.
  • Sclabas GM, Swain P, Swanstrom LL. Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov. 2006;13:23-30.
  • Voermans RP, Worm AM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Breedveld P, Bemelman WA, Fockens P. In vitro comparison and evaluation of seven gastric closure modalities for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy. 2008;40:595-601.
  • Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001.Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858. Accessed June 10, 2013
  • Meireles OR, Kantsevoy SV, Assumpcao LR, Magno P, Dray X, Giday SA. Reliable gastric closure after natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using a novel automated flexible stapling device. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1609-13.
  • Nakajima K, Nishida T, Milsom JW, Takahashi T, Souma Y, Miyazaki Y. Current limitations in endoscopic CO2 insufflation for NOTES: flow and pressure study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1036-42.
  • Nakajima K, Moon JH, Tsutsui S, Miyazaki Y, Yamasaki M, Yamada T. Esophageal submucosal dissection under steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy (SPACE): a randomized preclinical trial. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1-10.
  • Chiu PWY, Ho LKY, Reddy N, Seo DW, Tajiri H. Asia Pacific NOTES: where are we?. Gastrointest Interv. 2013;2:55-8.
  • Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P, Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3267-72.

Figure 1


MASTER with dexterous slave manipulators deployed at the distal end of the endoscope.