Essential vascular anatomy and choice of embolic materials in gastrointestinal bleeding
Somrach Thamtorawat, Chandran Nadarajan
Abstract
Non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding is the significant emergency problem to manage in the hospital. Transcatheter arterial embolization is minimally invasive treatment, which becomes an essential role in controlling bleeding, leading to lifesaving. To reach the goal, the interventional radiologist should have fundamental of vascular anatomy and choice of embolic material, which is the key to success.
Introduction
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a typical scenario that can be present in an emergency situation which can be a life-threatening condition. Mortality rates as high as 10% to 14% have been reported.1 The estimated annual incidence is approximately 20 to 150 cases per 10,000 persons.2 Cause of GI bleeding can be classified into variceal and non-variceal bleeding. A multidisciplinary team consisting of members of the endoscopy, surgery, and radiology department are necessary for the initiation of the appropriate treatment strategy. Most of the time, conservative medical and endoscopic treatments are the primary treatment choices used to achieve hemostasis in GI bleeding patients. However, uncontrolled bleeding after a failure of endoscopic treatment can occur, especially in non-variceal GI bleeding. Nowadays, endovascular treatment is the preferred option comparing to surgical treatment due to the less invasive nature of the procedure and associated less morbidity and mortality rates.3 Adequate knowledge of the GI vascular anatomy is utmost necessary to perform angiography and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) successfully in treating GI bleeding patients.
Vascular Anatomy for GI Bleeding
Stomach
The stomach is the largest alimentary tract organ. It has several vascular supplies which mainly arises from the CA. The gastric cardia and fundus are supplied by the LGA and short gastric artery (ShGA). The lesser curvature is supplied mainly by the LGA. The proximal greater curvature is supplied by the ShGA and left gastroepiploic artery (LGEA). The distal greater curvature of the stomach receives arterial supply from the right gastroepiploic arteries (RGEA) in 42% to 78% of cases while the rest is from the right gastric artery (RGA).5 The anterior wall of the antrum is supplied by the RGEA and the lower anterior branch of the LGA while the posterior wall is supplied by the RGA and the lower posterior branch of LGA. The RGEA and RGA supply pylorus.
The ShGA and LGEA arise from the splenic artery while the LGA arises directly from the CA in more than 90% of cases. An accessory LGA is reported in 1.8% to 2% of the European population.5 The RGA commonly arises from either the common hepatic artery or left hepatic artery. In a small portion of the population, it could arise from the gastroduodenal artery (GDA), the middle hepatic artery or the right hepatic artery. The RGEA arises from the GDA. The GDA arises from the common hepatic branch of the CA in 75% of cases. In the rest, it arises from the left or right hepatic artery or the SMA.5
Duodenum
Duodenum is the first part of the small intestine, supplied mainly by the GDA. Ligament of Treitz, which is found in the duodenojejunal junction, divides the location of the GI bleeding into the upper and lower GI tract which is essential in bleeding management.3,6 The duodenal bulb is supplied by the supraduodenal artery, which is a proximal branch of GDA.7 The anterior and posterior pancreaticoduodenal arcades supply the anterior and posterior surface of the duodenum. The arcades are formed by the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery, retroduodenal artery and the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery. Both anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery and retroduodenal artery are branches of the GDA while the inferior pancreaticoduodenal is a right branch of SMA. The inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery arise as dual anterior and posterior branch in 60% of the population while the rest of the population will have a single artery.8
Jejunum and ileum
Jejunum and ileum are supplied by the respective branches arising from the SMA. There are 4 to 6 jejunal branches and 9 to 13 ileal branches. Terminal ileum, cecum and inferior half of the ascending colon are supplied by the ileocolic artery arising as the terminal branch of SMA. The ileal and colic branches form the ileocolic loop. This loop gives rise to appendicular and anterior and posterior cecal arteries which supply appendix and cecum.8
Colon
Main vascular supply of the colon is SMA and IMA. The ascending colon and the right half of the transverse colon are supplied by the right and middle colic arteries which arise from the right side of the SMA. Splenic flexure and descending colon are supplied by LCA which is an ascending branch of the IMA. The sigmoidal branch of the IMA supplies the sigmoid colon. The right and middle colic arteries arise as a common trunk in more than half of populations. In some case, MCA arises from the CA.8 The MCA is also reported to be absent in 2% to 22% of subjects,9 while the right colic artery, could be absent in up to 50% of the population.10 The MCA extends to supply the splenic flexure when the LCA is absent in about 7% of populations.9 The sigmoidal branch arises either from a common ascending branch with the LCA or as a separate descending branch.8
Rectum
Rectum receives blood supply from branches of the IMA and the internal iliac arteries. The superior rectal artery which arises from the IMA supplies the upper rectum. This artery forms an anastomosis with the middle rectal artery, inferior rectal artery and the marginal artery.8 Middle and inferior rectal arteries are branches of the internal iliac artery and internal pudendal artery, respectively. A dominant retrosigmoid collateral supply from the internal iliac has been reported previously.9
Key Collateral Pathway
Collateral between the branches of CA (Fig. 2)
The branch of the LGA anastomoses with ShGA at the level of the fundus.5
The branch of the LGA and the RGA anastomose with each other at the level of the body and pylorus.
A right side branch of the dorsal pancreatic artery anastomoses with the branches from the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery or the RGEA.
The epiploic branches of the RGEA and LGEA forms the posterior omental arcade of Barkow. Branches from this arcade forms anastomoses with the branches from the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery, transverse pancreatic artery, MCA and the LCA.5,8
Collateral between the branches of CA, SMA, IMA and internal iliac artery (Fig. 3)
The persistent embryonic anastomotic branch between CA and SMA is called the arc of Buhler.
Anterior and posterior gastroduodenal arcade formed by the anastomosis between the superior pancreaticoduodenal artery and retroduodenal artery of the GDA with the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery of the SMA.
The ascending branch of the LCA anastomoses with the branch of the MCA, creating the arc of Riolan (medial) and marginal artery of Drummond (lateral).8,9
Superior rectal artery of the IMA forms an anastomosis with the middle rectal artery and inferior rectal artery which are the branches of the internal iliac artery and internal pudendal artery, respectively.8
Extra-alimentary Source of GI Bleeding
Hemobilia
Hemobilia is defined as bleeding into the biliary system which could be either bleeding into the intrahepatic or extrahepatic duct. It is an unusual source of GI bleeding in daily practice. The blood from the biliary system could pass into the bowel, and the patient can present with GI bleeding signs and symptoms. Over 50% of the etiology has iatrogenic cause such as secondary to biliary intervention procedure which accidentally created a fistulous communication between vessels and bile ducts. Pathologic vessels commonly from the artery however portal vein injury could be the cause of the hemobilia.11 Other known causes are biliary tumor or cholelithiasis but they are a less common occurrence. The most common presentation of hemobilia is melena. In a patient with a clinical presentation of GI bleeding and a history of prior biliary intervention or liver trauma, hemobilia should be considered.12,13 TAE is one of the good options to treat hemobilia. Hepatic artery and GDA pathology should be focused during angiography in case of iatrogenic bleeding (Fig. 4).14
Hemosuccus pancreaticus
Hemosuccus pancreaticus is a rare source of GI bleeding. It is defined as bleeding from ampulla of Vater via the pancreatic duct.15,16 Possible causes of hemosuccus pancreaticus include acute or chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic trauma, vascular malformation and pancreatic tumor. Chronic pancreatitis is the most common cause. It occurs due to pancreatic enzyme induced peripancreatic vascular wall injury and leads to the development of pseudoaneurysm. The GI bleeding can occur from the splenic artery, GDA, pancreatic artery, and pancreaticoduodenal artery in this condition (Fig. 5).17 The endovascular intervention plays a significant role in treating this condition.
Imaging Evaluation for GI Bleeding
The site of bleeding identification is the key to success in either surgical or endovascular treatment. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is the non-invasive imaging modality of choice due to diagnostic ability and fast acquisition time.18 Newer generation MDCTs have increased temporal and spatial resolution which allows it to provide better details regarding the site and cause of bleeding. Such data helps interventionist in planning TAE approach.19 CT angiography (CTA) able to detect bleeding which is at the rate of 0.35 mL/min.18,19 Images are acquired in the arterial phase, venous phase, and delayed phase. Arterial phase imaging is done roughly 30 seconds after intravenous (IV) contrast infusion. This phase is crucial in mapping the mesenteric vasculature and identifying the site of bleeding. Cross-referencing the arterial phase with either the non-contrast or venous phase (acquired roughly 60 seconds post IV contrast injection) helps in differentiating hemorrhage with intrinsically hyperdense bowel contents (e.g., old ingested barium or suture).18 The important limitation of CTA is the inability to detect intermittent bleeding. However, in patients with lower GI tract bleeding with stable hemodynamic status, the risk of rebleeding is reported as low if the initial CTA is negative.18
Tagged red blood cell scintigraphy can detect bleeding as slow as 0.1 mL/min and have the ability to detect intermittent bleeding through sequential scans. However, it has a poor spatial resolution, and it is difficult to pinpoint the exact site of bleeding especially in the small bowel.18 It is also time-consuming and not appropriate in the acute setting.19
Angiography meanwhile plays a dual role, both as a diagnostic tool as well as a therapeutic tool in dealing with GI bleeding. It has the sensitivity of detecting the bleeding rate of 0.5 to 1.0 mL/min.18 It should be considered in cases of recent ongoing GI bleeding even if the CTA is negative.19 The diagnostic accuracy of arteriography is reported as high if it is performed during the episode of active bleeding.6
Choice of Embolic Materials
Gelatin sponge
Gelatin sponge (GS) is a widely available embolic material used by interventional radiologist especially in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and acute arterial bleeding. GS is made from either the bovine or porcine collagen. It is a water-insoluble hemostatic agent. GS is a temporary embolic material as it resolves spontaneously over a period of 2 to 6 weeks. However, it can produce permanent embolization effect by inducing arteritis effect and intimal hyperplasia.20 The embolic effect of GS is dependent on the coagulation profile of the patient. Therefore, in a patient with severe coagulopathy, clinical failure of the hemostasis can occur.21
GS slurry can be prepared via two steps. Firstly, the GS is cut into small 1 mm cubes and mixed with contrast medium. It is followed by another step which is called ‘the pumping method’. It uses two syringes to pump the GS across a three-way stopcock valve to form the slurry consistency. The accurate size and concentration of GS are very challenging to be accurately estimated. During embolization, the catheter should be placed as close to the target vessels as possible. Careful monitoring of reflux is essential to prevent non-target embolization.
The advantages of GS are easy to use, widely available, inexpensive and has a temporary embolic effect. In the cases where the micro-catheter cannot reach to the target point, GS can be infused to reduce the blood flow and promote hemostasis. The GS particle can achieve a temporary embolic effect and disperse easily in case of massive extravasation (Fig. 6).
Polyvinyl alcohol and microsphere
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or microsphere is a permanent embolic material, with particle sizes ranging from 40 to 1200 μm. The PVA is an old particulate embolic material which is a non-radioopaque material with an irregular surface. The PVA can be mixed with contrast medium to make it visible during injection. However, clumping of the PVA particle does occur commonly due to the irregular surface and obstructs the catheter.
Microsphere agents are made from acrylics, hydrogels, resins, polymers, or glass. Its major advantage is the uniform shape and smooth surface which reduces the clumping effect. It allows easier delivery through the small micro-catheters.
The use of permanent particle agent is to reduce the vascular supply of the bleeder. The size of the particulate agent chosen in GI bleeding should not be smaller than 500 μm to avoid ischemic complication.22 However, due to the risk of infarction, the operator must be cautious during embolization particularly in colonic bleeding.23
Coil
The coil is considered as a large permanent embolic material. It is available in a variety of sizes, lengths, and shapes. It occludes the bleeding vessel by causing mechanical obstruction as well as promotes hemostasis at the pathologic vessels. The diameter of the coil ranges from 2 to 18 mm. Two delivery systems of the coil are available in the market which is the detachable and non-detachable type. The detachable coil is safer to be used during the coil packing. It prevents non-target embolization and misplacement of the coil. Two diameters of coil wire are available currently which is the 0.035 inch and 0.018 inch systems. Nowadays, the 0.018 inch microcoil systems are becoming more popular due to the ability to be used in a more distal embolization.
The main advantage of the coil is it could be placed at a precise location. If a medium or large pathologic vessel is needed to embolize, such as GDA, the coil is the most suitable choice. A coil is also commonly used in the treatment of GI bleeding secondary to pseudoaneurysm. It is used to occlude the parent artery. The drawback is that the coagulation disorder may affect the efficacy of embolization. Post coiling recurrent hemorrhage rate of up to 20% was reported among GI bleeding patients with coagulopathy.21,24 A single coil is rarely enough to get total vascular occlusion; therefore most procedure requires the usage of a few coils. It leads to longer operation time and higher cost (Fig. 7).
In cases of patients with positive GI bleeding findings in either endoscopic or CTA but negative findings in the conventional angiography, the coil embolization can be used as an empirical treatment as it is safe and effective.25 Two vessels which are commonly embolized empirically are the LGA and GDA.
N-butyl cyanoacrylate
N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) is a liquid embolic material which has been used in the interventional radiology field for several years. There are many advantages of NBCA. Firstly, the NBCA can reach the pathology point via bloodstream even in cases where the microcatheter cannot reach the target especially due to the severe tortuosity of the vessel. Secondly, it helps to prevent the retrograde backdoor filling of the collateral vessel. Lastly, the NBCA can cause vascular blockage by polymerization, independent of coagulation status of the patient. The major drawback of NBCA is the difficulty to handle the rate and flow of the material and needed to be handled by an experienced interventional radiologist.26
NBCA must be delivered mixed with lipiodol and under fluoroscopic guidance. Such a mixture has two significant roles; one it opacify the liquid to allow visualization during injection, and another one is it allows the control of the polymerization time. The lesser the concentration of NBCA in the mixture, the longer it takes to polymerize and therefore allows a more distal embolization. The operator could control the NBCA flow by adjusting the mixture concentration and injection rate. A forceful injection can make the NBCA go fast but also increases the risk of the reflux into the proximal non-target vessel. Before NBCA injection, flushing the delivery catheter with 5% dextrose solution is crucial to prevent premature polymerization within the catheter and thus occluding it. Immediately pull out of the catheter is also vital to prevent adherence of the catheter to vessel wall.
The critical complication that could occur during the NBCA embolization, particularly in the colon, is ischemia secondary to insufficient collateral flow. The animal studies had shown that the embolization of three or fewer vasa recta is safe and have a low risk of infarction. In a human study, it is reported that one vasa recta embolization is relatively safe but two or more branches may cause insignificant or self-limited ischemic damage.27 Risk of bowel ischemia evaluated by large meta-analysis states the complication rate secondary to NBCA embolization for upper GI bleeding and lower GI bleeding was 5.4% and 6.1%, respectively. This number is within the reported complication range of TAE for GI bleeding which ranges from 0% to 12% (Fig. 8).28,29
Onyx
Onyx (polyethylene vinyl alcohol) is a liquid cohesive agent, widely used in the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Its flow is more controllable comparing to NBCA. Onyx has to be mixed with tantalum powder to provide a very high radiopacity. Slow injection without worrying about microcatheter adhesion into the vessel is possible with Onyx due to its non-adhesive effect. Before injection, preloading of DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) into the dead space of microcatheter is needed. The main disadvantage is that DMSO can cause irritation and induce vasospasm and pain during injection. The other disadvantage is a relatively high cost of Onyx. Urbano et al30 reported a very high (93.5%) success rate in 31 patients by using Onyx in lower GI bleeding embolization. They also reported the zero rebleeding rate in a patient with low platelet and underlying coagulopathy.30
Conclusion
TAE play an essential role in the treatment of GI bleeding. The knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the GI tract and the collateral pathway of the visceral organs are required for successful treatment. The interventional radiologist should also be familiar with the characteristic, advantage and disadvantage of different embolic material which might affect the clinical outcome of the embolization.
Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Article information
Articles from Gastrointestinal Intervention are provided here courtesy of Gastrointestinal Intervention
References
- Longstreth GF. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage:
a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:206-10.
- Manning-Dimmitt LL, Dimmitt SG, Wilson GR. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding
in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71:1339-46.
- Abdel-Aal AK, Bag AK, Saddekni S, Hamed MF, Ahmed FY. Endovascular management of nonvariceal
upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:755-63.
- Song SY, Chung JW, Yin YH, Jae HJ, Kim HC, Jeon UB. Celiac axis and common hepatic
artery variations in 5002 patients: systematic analysis with spiral CT and DSA. Radiology. 2010;255:278-88.
- Prudius V, Procházka V, Pavlovský Z, Prudius D, Kala Z. Vascular anatomy of the stomach
related to resection procedures strategy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017;39:433-40.
- Marion Y, Lebreton G, Le Pennec V, Hourna E, Viennot S, Alves A. The management of
lower gastrointestinal bleeding. J Visc Surg. 2014;151:191-201.
- Hentati N, Fournier HD, Papon X, Aube C, Vialle R, Mercier P. Arterial supply of the
duodenal bulb: an anatomoclinical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999;21:159-64.
- Geboes K, Geboes KP, Maleux G. Vascular anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;15:1-14.
- Lange JF, Komen N, Akkerman G, Nout E, Horstmanshoff H, Schlesinger F. Riolan’s arch:
confusing, misnomer, and obsolete. A literature survey of the connection(s) between
the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries. Am J Surg. 2007;193:742-8.
- Ponti A, Gailloud P. Direct origin of the right colic artery from the abdominal aorta.
Ital J Anat Embryol. 2016;121:100-4.
- Kim JW, Shin JH, Park JK, Yoon HK, Ko GY, Gwon DI. Endovascular management for significant
iatrogenic portal vein bleeding. Acta Radiol. 2017;58:1320-5.
- Murugesan SD, Sathyanesan J, Lakshmanan A, Ramaswami S, Perumal S, Perumal SU. Massive
hemobilia: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. World J Surg. 2014;38:1755-62.
- Cathcart S, Birk JW, Tadros M, Schuster M. Hemobilia: an uncommon but notable cause
of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51:796-804.
- Prachayakul V, Thamtorawat S, Siripipattanamongkol C, Thanathanee P. Bleeding left
hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm: a complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.
Endoscopy. 2013;45:E223-4.
- Sadhu S, Sarkar S, Verma R, Dubey S, Roy M. Haemosuccus pancreaticus due to true splenic
artery aneurysm: a rare cause of massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Surg Case Rep. 2010:4.
- Vimalraj V, Kannan DG, Sukumar R, Rajendran S, Jeswanth S, Jyotibasu D. Haemosuccus
pancreaticus: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:345-50.
- Anil Kothari R, Leelakrishnan V, Krishnan M. Hemosuccus pancreaticus: a rare cause
of gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26:175-7.
- Raman SP, Fishman EK. Computed tomography angiography of the small bowel and mesentery.
Radiol Clin North Am. 2016;54:87-100.
- Parra DA, Chavhan GB, Shammas A, John PR. Computed tomography angiography in acute
gastrointestinal and intra-abdominal bleeding in children: preliminary experience.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013;64:345-50.
- Miyayama S, Yamakado K, Anai H, Abo D, Minami T, Takaki H. Guidelines on the use of
gelatin sponge particles in embolotherapy. Jpn J Radiol. 2014;32:242-50.
- Yonemitsu T, Kawai N, Sato M, Tanihata H, Takasaka I, Nakai M. Evaluation of transcatheter
arterial embolization with gelatin sponge particles, microcoils, and n-butyl cyanoacrylate
for acute arterial bleeding in a coagulopathic condition. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:1176-87.
- Frisoli JK, Sze DY, Kee S. Transcatheter embolization for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal
bleeding. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;7:136-42.
- Navuluri R, Kang L, Patel J, Van Ha T. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2012;29:178-86.
- Aina R, Oliva VL, Therasse E, Perreault P, Bui BT, Dufresne MP. Arterial embolotherapy
for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: outcome assessment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:195-200.
- Dixon S, Chan V, Shrivastava V, Anthony S, Uberoi R, Bratby M. Is there a role for
empiric gastroduodenal artery embolization in the management of patients with active
upper GI hemorrhage?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:970-7.
- Kwon JH, Han YH. Efficacy and safety of superselective trans-catheter arterial embolization
of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Emerg Radiol. 2018;25:111-20.
- Kodani M, Yata S, Ohuchi Y, Ihaya T, Kaminou T, Ogawa T. Safety and risk of superselective
transcatheter arterial embolization for acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage with
n-butyl cyanoacrylate: angiographic and colonoscopic evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:824-30.
- Hur S, Jae HJ, Lee H, Lee M, Kim HC, Chung JW. Superselective embolization for arterial
upper gastrointestinal bleeding using n-butyl cyanoacrylate: a single-center experience
in 152 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:1673-80.
- Kim PH, Tsauo J, Shin JH, Yun SC. Transcatheter arterial embolization of gastrointestinal
bleeding with N-butyl cyanoacrylate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety
and efficacy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:522-31.e5.
- Urbano J, Manuel Cabrera J, Franco A, Alonso-Burgos A. Selective arterial embolization
with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer for control of massive lower gastrointestinal
bleeding: feasibility and initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:839-46.
