pISSN 2636-0004
eISSN 2636-0012

Table. 3.

Summary of Representative Published Data on EUS-RFA for Pancreatic Neoplasms

Study No. of patients Indication (n) RF device Mean tumor size (range) Application power and time Mean RF sessions (range) Technical success (%) Clinical outcome (n) Adverse events (n)
Pai et al44 (2015) 6 Mucinous cyst (4), IPMN (1), microcystic adenoma (1), neuroendocrine tumor (2) Habib EUS-RFA catheter PCL: 36.5 (24–70), NET: 27.5 (15–40) 5–25 W, 90–120 sec 1.3 (1–2) 100 2 cyst resolution, 4 cyst reduction, 50% reduction in 2 NETs with vascular changes Mild abdominal pain (2)
Song et al2 (2016) 6 Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (4), metastatic pancreatic cancer (2) EUSRA 38 (30–90) 20–50 W, 10 sec 1.3 (1–2) 100 Necrosis at the ablation site Mild abdominal pain (2)
Lakhtakia and Seo39 (2017) 3 Insulinoma EUSRA 19 (14–22) 50 W, 10–15 sec 1 100 Complete resolution of hypoglycemia None
Scopelliti et al48 (2018) 10 Locally advanced pancreatic cancer EUSRA 49.2 (35–75) 20 or 30 W, 100–560 sec 1.4 (1–2) 100 Necrosis at the ablation site Mild abdominal pain (2), ascites (2), peripancreatic effusion (2)
Choi et al43 (2018) 10 NET (10), solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (2), insulinoma (1) EUSRA 20 (8–28) 50 W 1.6 (1–3) 100 Radiologic complete response (7) Mild abdominal pain (1), acute pancreatitis (1)
Barthet et al42 (2019) 29 IPMN (16), MCN (1), NET (14 lesions in 12) EUSRA PCL: 28 (9–60), NET: 13.1 (10–20) 50 W NA 100 NET: radiologic complete response (12), PCL: complete response (11), > 50% reduction (1) Acute pancreatitis (1), jejunal perforation (1), main pancreatic duct obstruction (1)

EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; RF, radiofrequency; PCL, pancreatic cystic lesion; IPMN, intraductal papillary neoplasm; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; NA, not available.

Int J Gastrointest Interv 2020;9:135~141 https://doi.org/10.18528/ijgii200036
© Int J Gastrointest Interv