pISSN 2636-0004
eISSN 2636-0012

Table. 1.

Comparision of PTBD, ERCP, and EUS for Advanced Hilar Biliary Obstrucion

PTBD ERCP EUS
Pros Well-tailored method Well-establised method Accessible in altered anatomy or failed ERCP
Higher technical and clinical success as a primary or rescue technique Primary clinical and long term data available Single step in ERCP room
Possible selective lobar selecion
Cons Impaired quality of life Complexity in high-grade strictures Limited data
Relatively high adverse events Difficult revision in multiple metal stents No definite tailored methods and accessories
Performed in special centers

PTBD, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound.

Int J Gastrointest Interv 2021;10:120~127 https://doi.org/10.18528/ijgii210035
© Int J Gastrointest Interv