pISSN 2636-0004
eISSN 2636-0012

Table. 1.

Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Author (yr) Number Operation time (min) Open conversion, n (%) Estimated blood loss (mL) POPF, n (%) Major morbidity*, n (%) LOS (day) Spleen preservation, n (%) Vessel preservation, n (%)
Lyman et al (2019)16 RDP (108)
LDP (139)
252
196
2 (1.9)
6 (4.3)
406
377
21 (19.4)
28 (20.1)
NA
NA
5.0
5.0
34 (31.5)
12 (8.6)
NA
NA
Hong et al (2020)13 RDP (46)
LDP (182)
166
141
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
NA
NA
4 (8.7)
19 (10.4)
1 (2.2)
3 (1.6)
8.0
8.1
30 (65.2)
47 (25.8)
NA
NA
Kwon et al (2022)8 RDP (104)
LDP (208)
180
164
0 (0.0)
8 (3.8)
351
411
16 (15.4)
31 (14.9)
3 (2.9)
9 (4.3)
7.9
8.6
57 (54.6)
105 (50.4)
21 (20.2)
48 (23.1)
Liu et al (2017)17 RDP (102)
LDP (102)
207
200
3 (2.9)
10 (9.8)
100
100
7 (6.9)
13 (12.8)
7 (6.9)
13 (12.8)
7.7
8.6
62 (60.8)
50 (49.0)
26 (25.5)
22 (21.6)
Lof et al (2021)18 RDP (402)
LDP (402)
285
240
27 (6.7)
61 (15.2)
150
150
99 (24.6)
106 (26.5)
57 (14.2)
66 (16.5)
8.5
7.0
153 (81.4)
122 (64.2)
112 (27.9)
82 (20.4)

POPF, postoperative pancreatic fistula; LOS, length of hospital stay after operation; RDP, robotic distal pancreatectomy; LDP, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; NA, not available.

*Major morbidity was defined as a Clavien-Dindo classification grade IIIa or above.

†Vessel preservation was defined as preservation of the splenic vein and splenic artery.

‡A statistically significant difference existed between two groups.

Int J Gastrointest Interv 2022;11:64~69 https://doi.org/10.18528/ijgii220011
© Int J Gastrointest Interv